Core-satellite is a compromise strategy. Most of your portfolio is boring, broad, and indexed. A small slice is yours to play with — individual stocks, sector bets, themes you believe in. It is the "have your cake and eat it too" approach to active investing.
| Component | % of portfolio | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Core (index funds) | 70-90% | Low-cost broad market exposure |
| Satellites | 10-30% | Active picks, themes, individual stocks |
The core is your discipline. The satellites are your fun. Both are intentional.
Enter your holdings and see your portfolio as a pie chart.
Open Portfolio Visualizer →Pure index investing is mathematically optimal for most people. Buy VTI or a 3-fund portfolio, hold forever, beat 80%+ of active investors after fees. The data is overwhelming.
But humans are not mathematically optimal. Many investors struggle to stay in pure index funds when:
For these investors, pure indexing is psychologically impossible. They eventually go off-script and hurt themselves. Core-satellite gives them a controlled outlet — yes, you can pick stocks, but only with 15% of your portfolio. The other 85% stays disciplined.
The core should be the same low-cost, broad-market funds a Bogleheads investor would hold for everything. Boring is the point.
Enter your holdings and see your portfolio as a pie chart.
Open Portfolio Visualizer →This is where investors take their active bets:
Sample $200,000 portfolio with 80/20 core-satellite split:
| Holding | Ticker | Amount | % | Layer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Total Market | VTI | $95,000 | 47.5% | Core |
| International Total | VXUS | $40,000 | 20% | Core |
| Bond Total Market | BND | $25,000 | 12.5% | Core |
| Berkshire Hathaway | BRK.B | $10,000 | 5% | Satellite |
| Semiconductor ETF | SOXX | $10,000 | 5% | Satellite |
| Bitcoin ETF | IBIT | $10,000 | 5% | Satellite |
| Small Cap Value | AVUV | $10,000 | 5% | Satellite |
80% in three core index funds. 20% spread across four satellites. The core does the work; the satellites add personality.
The honest answer: most satellites underperform the core they replaced. Studies of active vs passive consistently find that:
Individual stock picking by amateurs has even worse hit rates. The satellites usually drag your returns slightly compared to a pure index portfolio.
So why do core-satellite at all? Because the alternative for many investors is NOT pure indexing — it is full active management or stock picking with their entire portfolio. Core-satellite limits the damage from unavoidable active urges.
Use the portfolio visualizer to enter your holdings. Color the core in one set of colors and the satellites in another (mentally). The pie chart should show a dominant slice or two of core funds and several smaller slices of satellites.
If your "satellites" are bigger than your "core," you do not have a core-satellite portfolio — you have an active portfolio with index funds attached. Tighten up the structure.